The Superior Court of Justice has defined a deadline for Audit Courts to demand evidence of regular use of public funds – Leal Cotrim Advogados

Leal Cotrim Advogados


The Superior Court of Justice has defined a deadline for Audit Courts to demand evidence of regular use of public funds

The Superior Court of Justice (STJ) has recently dealt with a matter that raises debates within the ambit of Audit Courts: up to when these control bodies may demand accountability reports on the regular use of public funds and apply possible administrative sanctions.

The lack of a specific legal provision to regulate the matter brought about controversies concerning (i) the possibility of Audit Courts to request evidence of the regular use of public funds at any time, in view of the supposed non-applicability of statute of limitation with respect to claims for damages to the public treasury; (ii) the applicability of statute of limitation terms set forth in the Civil Code; and (iii) the applicability, by analogy, of rules that govern the deadlines for the Public Administration to exercise its police powers.

While judging Special Appeal 1,480,350/RS, the STJ affirmed that, even if one understands that claims for damages to the public treasury are not subject to statute of limitation — being it noteworthy that such may represent a collision with the most recent understanding of the Supreme Court on the matter —, it must be borne in mind that the burden of proof, in the case of such lawsuits, would be incumbent upon the claimant, whereas in the case of accountability reports the burden of proof is of the party responsible for the use of funds.

Due to such reason, said superior court concluded that the party responsible for the use of funds cannot be under the never ending obligation to prove that acted regularly, subject to the violation of the principles of legal security and due process of law, in contrast with the Rule of Law.

In the lack of a specific deadline set forth by law for such cases, and setting aside the possibility to apply the terms set forth by the Civil Code to the case, due to the particularities of Administrative Law, the STJ examined the rules concerning statute of limitation and decadence terms with respect to relationships between the Public Administration and citizens and concluded that the 5 year term is prevalent, so that it shall apply, by analogy, as the deadline to which Audit Courts shall abide to request accountability reports.

However, it must be noted that such understanding differs from the majority opinion within the Federal Audit Court (TCU). The latter understands the deadline for the imposition of sanctions is the general statute of limitation deadline set forth in the Civil Code, i.e., 10 years, which has been confirmed by TCU Normative Instruction 71, as of 28 November 2012, and was confirmed by said Audit Court in an Incident for Standardisation of Case Law judged shortly after the referred to Precedent of the STJ.

Notwithstanding the insistence of the Federal Audit Court with respect to the 10 year deadline, the existence of a precedent by the Superior Court of Justice enhances claims by public officers and/or private persons or entities to whom said audit court applied sanctions after the elapse of 5 years.

Privacy Policy

Leal Cotrim Jansen Advogados (“Leal Cotrim”) is firmly committed to respecting the privacy of its members, clients and all individuals whose personal data we collect, store or process in any other way. Any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person is personal data.

This Privacy Policy guides the processing of personal data by Leal Cotrim and disciplines the exercise of the rights of the individuals whose personal data are processed by Leal Cotrim and/or on behalf of Leal Cotrim. We kindly ask that you read it carefully before providing us with your personal data and every time you wish to know how we use your personal data.

1. How we process your personal data

All processing operations carried out by Leal Cotrim are compliant with the applicable laws, especially Law 13,709/2018 (“Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados”) and Law 8,906/1994 (“Estatuto da Advocacia”).

We only processes your personal data under the following legal basis:

(i) under your consent;
(ii) for compliance with a legal or regulatory obligation;
(iii) for the performance of a contract for the provision of legal services or in order to take related steps prior to entering in such a contract;
(iv) for the regular exercise of rights within a judicial lawsuit, na administrative or arbitral procedure; and
(v) for the purposes of the legitimate interests pursued by Leal Cotrim, except where such interests are overridden by your fundamental rights and freedoms which require protection of your personal data.

Visiting and browsing our website are anonymous. Regarding the use of our website, we only collect the personal data that are provided by you when you use the contact tool available on our website, under your explicit consent.

For your privacy to be preserved, if you forward you personal data to Leal Cotrim in order to be considered for one of our vacancies, they will be securely erased immediately after the recruitment process ends.

In any case, Leal Cotrim only processes the personal data that are necessary to achieve the purpose of the processing, and for the period that is necessary to do so.

2. How we protect you personal data

Leal Cotrim adopts technical and administrative measures to protect your personal data from unauthorized access and from non-intentional or unlawful destruction, loss, modification, communication and dissemination. However, any security incident involving your personal data that may cause you significant risk or harm will be communicated to you and to the National Data Protection Authority – ANPD within a reasonable time.

3. Your rights as data subject

As a data subject, you have the following rights, subject to the provisions of article 7, II, of Law 8,906/94 and article 7, VI, of Law 13,709/2018:

(i) confirmation as to whether your personal data are being processed;
(ii) access to your personal data;
(iii) rectification of your personal data that are incomplete, inaccurate or outdated;
(iv) anonymisation, restriction of processing, or erasure of your personal data that are unnecessary, excessive, or processed in non-compliance with the provisions of the applicable law;
(v) portability of your personal data for the use of another services provider, in accordance with the regulations issued by the National Data Protection Authority – ANPD, subject to the protection of commercial and industrial secrets;
(vi) erasure of your personal data, except in the cases provided for in the applicable law;
(vii) information about public and private entities with which we share your personal data;
(viii) information about the possibility of not providing your consent for the processing of personal data and about the consequences of the refusal;
(ix) withdrawal of your consent, subject to the public interest that may justify the processing to continue or the existence of another legal basis that authorizes it; and
(x) opposition to any processing of personal data based on one of the legal basis that do not require consent, provided that there has been a breach of the applicable law, and subject to the public interest that may justify the processing to continue.

4. How you can exercise your rights

At any time, you can exercise your rights as a data subject by sending a request to Following confirmation of your identity, your request shall be answered within the legal term or, in the absence of a legal term, within a reasonable period.

If you receive our institutional newsletters and no longer wish to receive them, you can also unsubscribe through the link that we provide in every newsletter.

5. Changes to this privacy policy

This Privacy policy was drafted in accordance with the current laws and may be modified to better suit the applicable laws and regulations. Any changes to this Privacy Policy will be effective as of the date indicated below.

01 December 2020